Comments on: RQuery: refactored and simplified http://nickelcode.com/2009/08/22/rquery-refactored-and-simplified/ penny for your thoughts, nickel for your code Sun, 15 Aug 2010 20:52:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: John Bender http://nickelcode.com/2009/08/22/rquery-refactored-and-simplified/comment-page-1/#comment-8295 John Bender Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:44:53 +0000 http://nickelcode.com/?p=492#comment-8295 @Dag I think the current syntax is terse enough and allows me to avoid using instance_eval which I make a point of avoiding where possible. Feel free to fork and hack as you please though, it would be cool to see an alternate implementation @Dag

I think the current syntax is terse enough and allows me to avoid using instance_eval which I make a point of avoiding where possible. Feel free to fork and hack as you please though, it would be cool to see an alternate implementation

]]> By: Dag http://nickelcode.com/2009/08/22/rquery-refactored-and-simplified/comment-page-1/#comment-8281 Dag Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:36:26 +0000 http://nickelcode.com/?p=492#comment-8281 You could have #where take a &block and instance_eval it in the context of the object, and have a syntax like User.where { age == 12 }. You could have #where take a &block and instance_eval it in the context of the object, and have a syntax like User.where { age == 12 }.

]]>